Disodium Cocoyl Glutamate

Surfactant or cleansing-system ingredient. EPA evaluates surfactants using aquatic toxicity together with biodegradation. This label alone does not supply those product-specific data.

Ingredient family
Cleansing agent
Source labels checked
July 21, 2026

Read it through four separate lenses.

03

Environmental evidence

Aquatic and grade screening

A surfactant must be judged by aquatic toxicity together with biodegradation, degradation products, concentration, and wastewater pathway.

See the environmental limits
04

Sensitivity + confidence

Finished-formula context

Irritation depends on concentration, blend, pH, rinse-off use, and impurities; this row is not a prediction that the cleanser will irritate.

Moderate confidence
Claim boundary

A useful formula role is not proof of beard growth, treatment of a skin condition, lower environmental impact, or suitability for every person. Finished-product behavior depends on concentration, processing, the rest of the formula, use pattern, and individual response.

Compare the formula job

Compare cleanser systems

A surfactant name is only one part of rinse-off performance. Compare the blend, directions, fragrance, and after-wash result.

Open the comparison

Human + environmental evidence

What deserves attention—and why.

Hazard is not the same as real-world risk. Exposure, dose, formula, wastewater treatment, farming location, and supplier controls can change the conclusion.

Screening priorityAquatic and grade screening

A surfactant must be judged by aquatic toxicity together with biodegradation, degradation products, concentration, and wastewater pathway.

Human useFinished-formula context

Irritation depends on concentration, blend, pH, rinse-off use, and impurities; this row is not a prediction that the cleanser will irritate.

Fish + aquatic animalsEndpoint package required

The exact grade needs fish, aquatic-invertebrate, algae, and biodegradation data. A plant-derived feedstock does not answer those questions.

Plants + land wildlifeFeedstock land impact possible

The coco- prefix can reflect coconut-derived fatty material, but source region and land-conversion history are undisclosed; terrestrial phytotoxicity is not established.

Persistence + fateBiodegradation is decisive

EPA surfactant criteria require faster biodegradation as aquatic toxicity rises and also consider degradation products.

Supply-chain issueFatty feedstock not traceable

Coconut or palm-kernel supply, processor, chain of custody, and amine/impurity controls are not disclosed.

Why this is usefulDecision boundary

Rinse-off exposure lowers skin contact time but sends more of the ingredient toward wastewater, so human and environmental judgments can point in different directions.

Better sourcing

What to ask the supplier for.

Require exact-grade OECD aquatic and ready-biodegradation results, wastewater-removal data, impurity limits, and fatty-feedstock origin. For palm-derived input, prefer RSPO Identity Preserved or Segregated chain of custody; for coconut, require no-conversion farm traceability.

Product occurrence ledger

Where we found it.

List position is a location clue only. It is not a concentration estimate, and formulas can change after our source check.

ProductProduct typeExact label wordingList positionSource checkResearch links
Scotch Porter Beard Wash Wash Disodium Cocoyl Glutamate Near the beginning July 21, 2026Partial snapshot; official label linked Open product research Official source

Human clinical results

What controlled tests add to this record.

An ingredient study is not a trial of every product containing that ingredient.

No qualifying clinical result is assigned.

The current record may still include regulatory, cosmetic-function, or safety-assessment evidence. Those sources are useful for their stated purpose but are not clinical proof of skin, hair, or finished-product performance.

What remains unknown.

Concentration

Exact level is not disclosed on the product labels we recorded.

Extraction / processing

Grade, refining, solvents, and other processing details are usually absent.

Impurities

Residuals and contaminants are not specified by an ordinary INCI list.

Formula interactions

Synergy or antagonism with other ingredients is a finished-formula question.

Product footprint

Manufacturing, transport, packaging, dose, and disposal remain outside an ingredient-only profile.

Evidence ledger

Open the source behind the summary.

A source supports only the claim named beside it. Database inclusion is not a blanket approval, and an assessed ingredient does not rate every finished product.

  1. 01
    European Commission

    CosIng cosmetic ingredient database

    Standard ingredient names and cosmetic functions. Database inclusion is not, by itself, a safety approval.

    Last checked July 13, 2026
  2. 02
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

    Safer Choice criteria for surfactants

    Why aquatic toxicity and biodegradation must be considered together for surfactants; it is not a product certification.

    Last checked July 13, 2026
  3. 03
    U.S. Food & Drug Administration

    Cosmetic ingredients

    The U.S. regulatory context: most cosmetic ingredients are not preapproved, and the marketer is responsible for product safety.

    Last checked July 13, 2026
  4. 04
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

    Safer Choice master criteria for safer chemical ingredients

    The screening framework used here: human toxicity, aquatic toxicity, persistence, and bioaccumulation are separate endpoints and must be judged within a chemical's functional class.

    Last checked July 14, 2026
  5. 05
    Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

    OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals

    Internationally recognized non-clinical methods for health and environmental safety testing. A marketing claim or safety-data-sheet summary is not a substitute for endpoint data from an appropriate test.

    Last checked July 14, 2026
  6. 06
    Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil

    RSPO production and supply-chain standards

    The standards define requirements for certified oil-palm production and chain-of-custody. Identity Preserved or Segregated supply offers stronger physical traceability than an undisclosed palm-derived feedstock.

    Last checked July 14, 2026
  7. 07
    Nature Food

    Oil-crop supply chains and global biodiversity loss

    A spatial supply-chain analysis found that oil-palm, coconut, and soybean cultivation accounted for most modeled oil-crop biodiversity impacts, concentrated in tropical regions. It supports traceable, location-specific screening rather than blanket substitution.

    Last checked July 14, 2026